Duterte Admin RUMESBAK! Trillanes PANSAMANTALANG KALIGAYAHAN LANG GINAWA ni JUDGE SORIANO!

The War is not over.
The Duterte administration is not quitting its case against Antonio Trillanes IV, as they will bring the battle to the Court of Appeals (CA) to seek the reversal of a Makati court's decision junking a petition for the lawmaker's arrest.
"I just talked with the Solictor General, he will be going to the Court of Appeals to make a reversal of that decision," Salvador Panelo, President Duterte's spokesperson and chief legal counsel, said. He was referring to Solicitor General Jose Calida.
Makati Regional Trial Court Branch 148 junks the Justice Department's petition for an alias arrest warrant and travel ban against Trillanes. However, it maintained Duterte's Proclamation 572 that annul the amnesty granted to the senator by Ex-President Benigno Aquino III over two failed coup d’etat attempts in 2003 and 2007.
Panelo said Trillanes should not be happy as the decision is just good for an "empty victory" and "only delayed the case from going to its ultimate end."
Panelo is confident that the CA will side with the Duterte Administration.
"Precisely, the court said the proclamation revoking his amnesty is valid. What will be the legal basis for Trillanes to be shouting with joy?" he said.
Panelo said the court decision declaring Duterte's proclamation as valid is "more important and paramount," as it confirms that the administration is not harassing its enemies, conflicting to Trillanes' claim.
In the resolution issued by Makati RTC Branch 148 Presiding Judge Andres Soriano, he asserted that the lawmaker applied for an amnesty and admitted his guilt over the incidents.
"The court finds and so holds that Trillanes did file his amnesty application in the prescribed form in which he also admitted guilt for his participation in the Oakwood Mutiny, among others, and in which he further recanted all previous statements that he may have made contrary to said admission," the decision reads.
Panelo, however, maintained that this is questionable.
"Even if he did apply for an amnesty, he did not comply with the requirements imposed by law," he said.